Review



monoclonal antibody  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems monoclonal antibody
    Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 26 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mab266/Human+CXCL10%2FIP-10%2FCRG-2+Antibody/pm41665072-350-14-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 26 article reviews
    monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Anti-PD-L1 and IL-2 cytokines
    Article Snippet: In one embodiment, the CXCL10 antigen-binding site comprises the CDRH1, CDRH2, CDRH3, CDRL1, CDRL2 and CDRL3, or the VH, or the VL or the VH and VL region of mAb266 (R & D systems) or from any one of the anti-CXCL10 antibodies described in WO017/8708 (including CR.G (IP-10) (IgG1) (PharMingen) ande IP-10 (IgG)(A.Luster), WO02/15932, WO03/006045, WO2004/082714, WO2004/045525, WO2004/045526, WO2004/101511 (including antibodies in table 1 and AIP12, HuAIP12, MuAIP12, AIP13, HuAIP13, MuAIP13, AIP6, AIP8, AIP14, AIP18, AIP21, AIP22, AIP5 and AIP17), WO2005/060457 (including AIP5, AIP6, AIP8, AIP10, AIP12, AIP13, AIP14, AIP17, AIP18, AIP21, AIP22, AIP32 and AIP36), WO2005/011605, WO2005/023201, WO2005/058815 (including 1D4, 1E1, 2G1, 3C4, 6A5, 6A8, 6B10, 7C10, 8F6, 10A12 and 10A12S13C4), WO2005/084708, WO2006/039819, WO2006/118085, WO2008/047486, WO2008/044824 (including antibodies #124, #31, #28, #43 and #137), WO2008/106200, WO2009/023566, WO2012/149320 (including MSX-1100 and 6A5), WO2014/003742 (including the antibody of Example 14), WO2013/170735, WO2014/189306, WO2015/063187; the sequences and features of the anti-CXCL10 antibodies are incorporated herein by reference.

    Article Title: Bispecific antibody for ICOS and PD-L1
    Article Snippet: In one embodiment, the CXCL10 antigen-binding site comprises the CDRH1, CDRH2, CDR3, CDRL1, CDRL2 and CDRL3, or the VH, or the VL or the VH and VL region of mAb266 (R & D systems) or from any one of the anti-CXCL10 antibodies described in WO017/8708 (including CR.G (IP-10) (IgG1) (PharMingen) ande IP-10 (IgG)(A.Luster), WO02/15932, WO03/006045, WO2004/082714, WO2004/045525, WO2004/045526, WO2004/101511 (including antibodies in table 1 and AIP12, HuAIP12, MuAIP12, AIP13, HuAIP13, MuAIP13, AIP6, AIP8, AIP14, AIP18, AIP21, AIP22, AIP5 and AIP17), WO2005/060457 (including AIP5, AIP6, AIP8, AIP10, AIP12, AIP13, AIP14, AIP17, AIP18, AIP21, AIP22, AIP32 and AIP36), WO2005/011605, WO2005/023201, WO2005/058815 (including 1D4, 1E1, 2G1, 3C4, 6A5, 6A8, 6610, 7C10, 8F6, 10A12 and 10A12S13C4), WO2005/084708, WO2006/039819, WO2006/118085, WO2008/047486, WO2008/044824 (including antibodies #124, #31, #28, #43 and #137), WO2008/106200, WO2009/023566, WO2012/149320 (including MSX-1100 and 6A5), WO2014/003742 (including the antibody of Example 14), WO2013/170735, WO2014/189306, WO2015/063187; the sequences and features of the anti-CXCL10 antibodies are incorporated herein by reference.

    Article Title: TIGIT antibodies, encoding nucleic acids and methods of using said antibodies in vivo
    Article Snippet: In one embodiment, the CXCL10 antigen-binding site comprises the CDRH1, CDRH2, CDRH3, CDRL1, CDRL2 and CDRL3, or the VH, or the VL or the VH and VL region of mAb266 (R & D systems) or from any one of the anti-CXCL10 antibodies described in WO017/8708 (including CR.G (IP-10) (IgG1) (PharMingen) ande IP-10 (IgG)(A.Luster), WO02/15932, WO03/006045, WO2004/082714, WO2004/045525, WO2004/045526, WO2004/101511 (including antibodies in table 1 and AIP12, HuAIP12, MuAIP12, AIP13, HuAIP13, MuAIP13, AIP6, AIP8, AIP14, AIP18, AIP21, AIP22, AIP5 and AIP17), WO2005/060457 (including AIP5, AIP6, AIP8, AIP10, AIP12, AIP13, AIP14, AIP17, AIP18, AIP21, AIP22, AIP32 and AIP36), WO2005/011605, WO2005/023201, WO2005/058815 (including 1D4, 1E1, 2G1, 3C4, 6A5, 6A8, 6B10, 7C10, 8F6, 10A12 and 10A12S13C4), WO2005/084708, WO2006/039819, WO2006/118085, WO2008/047486, WO2008/044824 (including antibodies #124, #31, #28, #43 and #137), WO2008/106200, WO2009/023566, WO2012/149320 (including MSX-1100 and 6A5), WO2014/003742 (including the antibody of Example 14), WO2013/170735, WO2014/189306, WO2015/063187; the sequences and features of the anti-CXCL10 antibodies are incorporated herein by reference.

    Recombinant:

    Article Title: Astrocytic response mediated by the CLU risk allele inhibits OPC proliferation and myelination in a human iPSC model.
    Article Snippet: .. REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies Rabbit polyclonal anti-GFAP DAKO Cat# N1506; RRID: AB_10013482 Mouse monoclonal anti-S100b Sigma-Aldrich Cat# S2532; RRID: AB_477499 Rabbit polyclonal anti-OLIG2 EMD Millipore Cat# AB9610; RRID: AB_570666 Mouse monoclonal IgM anti-O4 Sigma-Aldrich Cat# O7139; RRID: AB_477662 Anti-O4 MicroBeads Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-096-670; RRID: AB_2847907 Goat polyclonal anti-SOX10 R&D systems Cat# AF2864; RRID: AB_442208 Rat monoclonal anti-MBP Millipore Cat# MAB386; RRID: AB_94975 Rabbit polyclonal anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9661; RRID: AB_2341188 Rabbit polyclonal anti-STAT1 Santa Cruz Cat# sc-346; RRID: AB_632435 Rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-STAT1 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9167; RRID: AB_561284 Rabbit monoclonal anti-CLUSTERIN Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 34642; RRID: AB_2799057 Mouse monoclonal anti-CLUSTERIN Santa Cruz Cat# sc-5289; RRID: AB_673566 Mouse monoclonal anti-CXCL10 R&D systems Cat# MAB266; RRID: AB_2261309 Rabbit polyclonal anti-TDP-43 Proteintech Cat# 10782-2-AP; RRID: AB_615042 Goat polyclonal anti- Galectin-7 R&D systems Cat# AF1339; RRID: AB_2297076 Mouse monoclonal anti-hnRNP E2 Santa Cruz Cat# sc-101136; RRID: AB_1124684 Rabbit polyclonal anti- Neurofilament 200 Sigma-Aldrich Cat# N4142; RRID: AB_477272 Goat polyclonal anti-SOX9 R&D systems Cat# AF3075; RRID: AB_2194160 Biological samples Human brain tissue Banner Sun Health Research Institute www.brainandbodydonationprogram.org Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins DMEM/F12 GIBCO Cat# 11330-032 Matrigel Corning Cat# CB40230 mTeSR1 Stem Cell Technologies Cat# 85850 Y-27632 Reprocell Cat# 04-0012-10 Accutase Sigma-Aldrich Cat# A6964 N2 Life Technologies Cat# 17502048 B27 Life Technologies Cat# 12587010 GlutaMax GIBCO Cat# 35050079 NEAA Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11140076 CHIR99021 Cellagen Technology Cat# C2477-50 SB431542 Stemgent Cat# 04-0010 LDN-193189 Stemgent Cat# 04-0074 Smoothened agonist (SAG) EMD Millipore Cat# 566660 bFGF PeproTech Cat# 100-18B EGF PeproTech Cat# 100-15 Retinoic acid Sigma-Aldrich Cat# R2625 CNTF R&D systems Cat# 257-NT-050 PDGFAA R&D systems Cat# 221-AA-050 IGF-1 R&D systems Cat# 291-G1-200 HGF R&D systems Cat# 294-HG-025 NT3 EMD Millipore Cat# GF031 3,30,5-Triiodo-L-thyronine (T3) Sigma-Aldrich Cat# T2877 Biotin Sigma-Aldrich Cat# 4639 (Continued on next page) 20 Cell Reports 42, 112841, August 29, 2023 .. REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Dibutyryl-cAMP Sigma-Aldrich Cat# D0627 L-Ascorbic acid Sigma-Aldrich Cat# A4403 Inuslin Sigma-Aldrich Cat# I9278 TGFa Stemcell Techology Cat# 78157.1 IL1b R&D systems Cat# 201-LB-005 Human Clusterin Protein R&D Systems Cat# 2937-HS-050 Critical commercial assays Tetro cDNA Synthesis kit BioLINE Cat# Bio-65043 SYBR Green Master Mix Thermo Scientific Cat# F416L P3 4D nucleofection kit Lonza Cat# V4XP-3024 Human Clusterin Quantikine ELISA Kit R&D Systems Cat# DCLU00 HUMAN IP-10/CXCL10 ELISA KIT MilliporeSigma Cat# RAB0119 Click-iTTM Plus EdU Cell Proliferation Kit Invitrogen Cat# C10637 Magna ChIPTM A/G Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Kit Sigma Cat# 17-10085 CUT&RUN Assay Kit Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 86652 Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System Promega Cat# E1910 Alexa FluorTM 488 Tyramide SuperBoostTM Kit, goat anti-mouse IgG Invitrogen Cat# B40912 hPSC Genetic Analysis Kit Stemcell Techology Cat# 07550 PureLinkTM Genomic DNA Mini Kit Invitrogen Cat# K182001 Deposited data Mass spectrometry analysis of differential binding to the C vs. T allele by nuclear proteins This paper MassIVE: MSV000088660 RNA-seq analysis of C/C vs. T/T or C/T astrocytes This paper GEO: GSE193218 Experimental models: Cell lines ADRC18 fibroblast UCI-ADRC N/A AG14048 fibroblasts Coriell Cat# AG14048 AG06869 fibroblasts Coriell Cat# AG06869 Human primary astrocytes ScienCell Cat# 1800 Oligonucleotides See Tables S6 and S7 for details N/A N/A Software and algorithms NIS-Elements AR Nikon RRID: SCR_014329 ZEN 3.1 Carl Zeiss RRID:SCR_013672 Image Lab Software Bio-rad RRID:SCR_014210 Fiji (ImageJ) Fiji (ImageJ) RRID: SCR_002285 Graphpad Prism 9 Graphpad Software RRID: SCR_002798 Biorender Biorender RRID:SCR_018361



    Similar Products

    94
    Bio-Techne corporation human cxcl10/ip-10/crg-2 antibody
    Human Cxcl10/Ip 10/Crg 2 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mab266/Human+CXCL10%2FIP-10%2FCRG-2+Antibody/custom%40mab266%4042305612
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human cxcl10/ip-10/crg-2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems monoclonal antibody
    Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mab266/Human+CXCL10%2FIP-10%2FCRG-2+Antibody/pm41665072-350-14-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems mouse anti human cxcl10
    Mouse Anti Human Cxcl10, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mab266/Human+CXCL10%2FIP-10%2FCRG-2+Antibody/pm41665072-350-10-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti human cxcl10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems anti cxcl10 neutralizing antibody
    Suppressing IFN signaling in PDA reduces ICAM-1 and <t>CXCL10</t> levels. PDA cell lines were plated overnight for attachment. On the following day, PDA cells were treated with JAKi at 10μM and 25μM overnight. After JAKi treatment, it was removed, and tMUC1-CAR T cells or Mock T cells were added at E:T ratio of 5:1 in the absence of JAKi. The E:T ratio was calculated based on the initial number of PDA cells plated. After 24hr, co-culture supernatants were collected and assayed for cytokine levels of (A) ICAM-1 and (B) CXCL10 by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate. Baseline levels of ICAM-1 and CXCL10 were low (<50pg/ml and <10pg/ml, respectively) in either CAR T cell-only or in PDA-only cultures, which were detected by ELISA. The statistical comparison was conducted between CAR T cell treatment in JAKi-pretreated PDA and CAR T cell treatment in PDA without JAKi pretreatment. *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001 (unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).
    Anti Cxcl10 Neutralizing Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mab266/Human+CXCL10%2FIP-10%2FCRG-2+Antibody/pmc12370727-142-30-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl10 neutralizing antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems antibodies blocking cxcl10
    Sustained tumor cell STING signaling promotes T cell migration (A) Representative IHC images of STING staining of a TMA ( n = 63). 0 = no tumor cell staining; 1+ = faint, 2+ = moderate, 3+ = strong staining in >10% of tumor cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Tumor cell STING staining in PTEN-null TNBCs. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Immunoblot of STING and other proteins across TNBC lines, including ADU-S100 (ADU; 50 μM, 3 h)-treated THP-1 monocytes to distinguish phosphorylated STING (pSTING). (D) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 parental cells, cells expressing scramble (Scr), or Rab7 knockout (KO) vectors (Sg1 and Sg2). (E) <t>CXCL10</t> ELISA from conditioned medium (CM) of the indicated Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with ADU at 50 μM for 48 h ( n = 4–8) or PBS control (ctrl). (F) Immunoblot of PTEN-null HCC70 cells treated with ADU at 50 μM for 3 h. (G) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with 50 μM ADU at the indicated time points. (H) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with 50 μM ADU for 24 h. (I) Heatmap showing log2 fold change (L2FC) of a cytokine/chemokine panel, normalized to untreated Scr cells ( n = 2–4). Red asterisk indicates values above assay in all conditions, black asterisk indicates above assay in treated conditions, using the upper limit for L2FC calculation. (J) CXCL10 ELISA in CM from the indicated cell lines with or without 50 μM ADU treatment at 48 h ( n = 2–4). (K) T cell migration assay schematic. (L) Representative images of CD8 + T cells (yellow) migrating toward MDAMB231 spheroids (Hoechst). Migrated CD8 + T cells were quantified after 48 h ( n = 9). Scale bar, 100 μm. (M) Representative images of CD8 + T cells (yellow) migrating toward Rab7 KO MDAMB231 spheroids (Hoechst). Migrated CD8 + T cells were quantified after 48 h ( n = 5–6). Scale bar, 100 μm. Quantitative data are represented as mean ± SEM. p values were calculated by one-way (J, L, and M) and two-way (E) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ns, not significant. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Antibodies Blocking Cxcl10, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mab266/Human+CXCL10%2FIP-10%2FCRG-2+Antibody/pmc12281382-501-49-52
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies blocking cxcl10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Suppressing IFN signaling in PDA reduces ICAM-1 and CXCL10 levels. PDA cell lines were plated overnight for attachment. On the following day, PDA cells were treated with JAKi at 10μM and 25μM overnight. After JAKi treatment, it was removed, and tMUC1-CAR T cells or Mock T cells were added at E:T ratio of 5:1 in the absence of JAKi. The E:T ratio was calculated based on the initial number of PDA cells plated. After 24hr, co-culture supernatants were collected and assayed for cytokine levels of (A) ICAM-1 and (B) CXCL10 by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate. Baseline levels of ICAM-1 and CXCL10 were low (<50pg/ml and <10pg/ml, respectively) in either CAR T cell-only or in PDA-only cultures, which were detected by ELISA. The statistical comparison was conducted between CAR T cell treatment in JAKi-pretreated PDA and CAR T cell treatment in PDA without JAKi pretreatment. *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001 (unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Tumor-intrinsic interferon signaling drives pancreatic cancer resistance to tumor mucin1-targeted CAR T cell therapy

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1618415

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Suppressing IFN signaling in PDA reduces ICAM-1 and CXCL10 levels. PDA cell lines were plated overnight for attachment. On the following day, PDA cells were treated with JAKi at 10μM and 25μM overnight. After JAKi treatment, it was removed, and tMUC1-CAR T cells or Mock T cells were added at E:T ratio of 5:1 in the absence of JAKi. The E:T ratio was calculated based on the initial number of PDA cells plated. After 24hr, co-culture supernatants were collected and assayed for cytokine levels of (A) ICAM-1 and (B) CXCL10 by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate. Baseline levels of ICAM-1 and CXCL10 were low (<50pg/ml and <10pg/ml, respectively) in either CAR T cell-only or in PDA-only cultures, which were detected by ELISA. The statistical comparison was conducted between CAR T cell treatment in JAKi-pretreated PDA and CAR T cell treatment in PDA without JAKi pretreatment. *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001 (unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).

    Article Snippet: On the following day, PDA cells were pre-incubated with PD-L1 blocking antibody (10μg/ml) or its isotype control antibody (10μg/ml; Cat# 400348; BioLegend), anti-ICAM-1 neutralizing antibody (5μg/ml; Cat# AF720; R&D Systems), anti-CXCL10 neutralizing antibody (5μg/ml; Cat# MAB266-100; R&D Systems), or fresh media alone for 2hr.

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Comparison

    Suppressing IFN signaling in CAR T cells slightly decreases ICAM-1 level. PDA cell lines were plated overnight for attachment. On the same day, tMUC1-CAR T cells were treated with or without JAKi at 10μM and 25μM overnight. On the following day, JAKi-pretreated CAR T cells were washed with fresh media to remove JAKi before being added to PDA cells at E:T ratio of 5:1 for co-culture. After 24hr, co-culture supernatants were collected and assayed for cytokine levels of (A) ICAM-1 and (B) CXCL10 by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate. The statistical comparison was conducted between JAKi-pretreated CAR T cell group and media-pretreated CAR T cell group in PDA. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Tumor-intrinsic interferon signaling drives pancreatic cancer resistance to tumor mucin1-targeted CAR T cell therapy

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1618415

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Suppressing IFN signaling in CAR T cells slightly decreases ICAM-1 level. PDA cell lines were plated overnight for attachment. On the same day, tMUC1-CAR T cells were treated with or without JAKi at 10μM and 25μM overnight. On the following day, JAKi-pretreated CAR T cells were washed with fresh media to remove JAKi before being added to PDA cells at E:T ratio of 5:1 for co-culture. After 24hr, co-culture supernatants were collected and assayed for cytokine levels of (A) ICAM-1 and (B) CXCL10 by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate. The statistical comparison was conducted between JAKi-pretreated CAR T cell group and media-pretreated CAR T cell group in PDA. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (unpaired t test with Welch’s correction).

    Article Snippet: On the following day, PDA cells were pre-incubated with PD-L1 blocking antibody (10μg/ml) or its isotype control antibody (10μg/ml; Cat# 400348; BioLegend), anti-ICAM-1 neutralizing antibody (5μg/ml; Cat# AF720; R&D Systems), anti-CXCL10 neutralizing antibody (5μg/ml; Cat# MAB266-100; R&D Systems), or fresh media alone for 2hr.

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Comparison

    Engagement of CAR T cell with PDA induces function loss of CAR T cells and up-regulation of immune checkpoints. (A) Loss of CAR T cell cytotoxicity. CAR T cells or Mock T cells were co-cultured with MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells at E:T ratio of 5:1 or cultured with media alone for overnight. Then the live CAR T cells and Mock T cells were isolated from the first round co-culture, and they were added to the fresh MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII plates at E:T ratio of 2:1 or 5:1 for 24hr as the second round of co-culture. At the end of culture, tumor cell lysis against MiaPaCa-2 (left panel) or against HPAFII (right panel) was determined using MTT assay. The percentage of lysis was calculated using the formula: [(OD of co-culture with Mock T cells– OD of co-culture with CAR T cells)/OD of co-culture with Mock T cells] ×100. The mock T cells and CAR T cells are from the same pair for calculation. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from quadruplicate. The statistical difference was conducted for cytolysis of CAR T cells retrieved from co-culture with PDA cells when compared with cytolysis of CAR T cells retrieved from culture with media alone. ****p<0.0001 (Multiple unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction). (B) Increase of CD25 expression on CAR T cells after engagement with PDA. CAR T cells were co-cultured with MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells at E:T ratio of 5:1 or cultured with media alone for overnight. Then CAR T cells were stained and analyzed for CD25 expression on CAR-positive and CAR-negative live cells after gating on CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells. (C) Expression of ICs on CAR T cells. Cell culture was performed same as in (B) . IC expression on CAR-positive and CAR-negative live cells were displayed after gating on CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells. (D) The retaining of tMUC1 and up-regulation of PD-L1 on PDA. After rinsing off suspension cells in co-culture from (B) , adherent MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were stained and analyzed for tMUC1 and PD-L1. PDA cells cultured in media alone were included as baseline control. (E) Suppressing tumor IFN signaling blocks CAR T cells-induced PD-L1 increase. MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were pre-treated with JAKi at 25μM overnight. Then JAKi was removed, and CAR T cells were added in the absence of JAKi at E:T ratio of 5:1, calculated based on the initial number of PDA cells plated. After 24hr treatment with CAR T cells, live adherent PDA cells were stained and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. (F) Effectiveness of PD-L1 blocking antibody. CAR T cells-treated HPAFII cells were pre-incubated with PD-L1 blocking antibody at the indicated doses, followed by PD-L1-PE staining. (G) Blocking PD-L1 partially reversed HPAFII resistance to CAR T cell lysis. MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were treated with CAR T cells or Mock T cells in the presence of PD-L1 blocking antibody or its isotype control for 24hr. PDA cell lysis was determined using MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from quadruplicate. The statistical difference was conducted for cytolysis of CAR T cells with PD-L1 blocking antibody when compared with cytolysis of CAR T cells with media alone. ****p<0.0001 (unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction). (H) Involvement of ICAM-1 and CXCL10 in CAR T cell cytotoxicity. MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were treated with CAR T cells or Mock T cells in the presence of anti-ICAM-1 or anti-CXCL10 antibodies for 24hr. PDA cell lysis was determined using MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from quadruplicate. The statistical difference was conducted for cytolysis of CAR T cells with neutralizing antibody when compared with cytolysis of CAR T cells with media alone. **p<0.01 (unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction).

    Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

    Article Title: Tumor-intrinsic interferon signaling drives pancreatic cancer resistance to tumor mucin1-targeted CAR T cell therapy

    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1618415

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Engagement of CAR T cell with PDA induces function loss of CAR T cells and up-regulation of immune checkpoints. (A) Loss of CAR T cell cytotoxicity. CAR T cells or Mock T cells were co-cultured with MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells at E:T ratio of 5:1 or cultured with media alone for overnight. Then the live CAR T cells and Mock T cells were isolated from the first round co-culture, and they were added to the fresh MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII plates at E:T ratio of 2:1 or 5:1 for 24hr as the second round of co-culture. At the end of culture, tumor cell lysis against MiaPaCa-2 (left panel) or against HPAFII (right panel) was determined using MTT assay. The percentage of lysis was calculated using the formula: [(OD of co-culture with Mock T cells– OD of co-culture with CAR T cells)/OD of co-culture with Mock T cells] ×100. The mock T cells and CAR T cells are from the same pair for calculation. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from quadruplicate. The statistical difference was conducted for cytolysis of CAR T cells retrieved from co-culture with PDA cells when compared with cytolysis of CAR T cells retrieved from culture with media alone. ****p<0.0001 (Multiple unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction). (B) Increase of CD25 expression on CAR T cells after engagement with PDA. CAR T cells were co-cultured with MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells at E:T ratio of 5:1 or cultured with media alone for overnight. Then CAR T cells were stained and analyzed for CD25 expression on CAR-positive and CAR-negative live cells after gating on CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells. (C) Expression of ICs on CAR T cells. Cell culture was performed same as in (B) . IC expression on CAR-positive and CAR-negative live cells were displayed after gating on CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells. (D) The retaining of tMUC1 and up-regulation of PD-L1 on PDA. After rinsing off suspension cells in co-culture from (B) , adherent MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were stained and analyzed for tMUC1 and PD-L1. PDA cells cultured in media alone were included as baseline control. (E) Suppressing tumor IFN signaling blocks CAR T cells-induced PD-L1 increase. MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were pre-treated with JAKi at 25μM overnight. Then JAKi was removed, and CAR T cells were added in the absence of JAKi at E:T ratio of 5:1, calculated based on the initial number of PDA cells plated. After 24hr treatment with CAR T cells, live adherent PDA cells were stained and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. (F) Effectiveness of PD-L1 blocking antibody. CAR T cells-treated HPAFII cells were pre-incubated with PD-L1 blocking antibody at the indicated doses, followed by PD-L1-PE staining. (G) Blocking PD-L1 partially reversed HPAFII resistance to CAR T cell lysis. MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were treated with CAR T cells or Mock T cells in the presence of PD-L1 blocking antibody or its isotype control for 24hr. PDA cell lysis was determined using MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from quadruplicate. The statistical difference was conducted for cytolysis of CAR T cells with PD-L1 blocking antibody when compared with cytolysis of CAR T cells with media alone. ****p<0.0001 (unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction). (H) Involvement of ICAM-1 and CXCL10 in CAR T cell cytotoxicity. MiaPaCa-2 or HPAFII cells were treated with CAR T cells or Mock T cells in the presence of anti-ICAM-1 or anti-CXCL10 antibodies for 24hr. PDA cell lysis was determined using MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean ± SD from quadruplicate. The statistical difference was conducted for cytolysis of CAR T cells with neutralizing antibody when compared with cytolysis of CAR T cells with media alone. **p<0.01 (unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction).

    Article Snippet: On the following day, PDA cells were pre-incubated with PD-L1 blocking antibody (10μg/ml) or its isotype control antibody (10μg/ml; Cat# 400348; BioLegend), anti-ICAM-1 neutralizing antibody (5μg/ml; Cat# AF720; R&D Systems), anti-CXCL10 neutralizing antibody (5μg/ml; Cat# MAB266-100; R&D Systems), or fresh media alone for 2hr.

    Techniques: Cell Culture, Isolation, Co-Culture Assay, Lysis, MTT Assay, Expressing, Staining, Suspension, Control, Blocking Assay, Incubation

    Sustained tumor cell STING signaling promotes T cell migration (A) Representative IHC images of STING staining of a TMA ( n = 63). 0 = no tumor cell staining; 1+ = faint, 2+ = moderate, 3+ = strong staining in >10% of tumor cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Tumor cell STING staining in PTEN-null TNBCs. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Immunoblot of STING and other proteins across TNBC lines, including ADU-S100 (ADU; 50 μM, 3 h)-treated THP-1 monocytes to distinguish phosphorylated STING (pSTING). (D) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 parental cells, cells expressing scramble (Scr), or Rab7 knockout (KO) vectors (Sg1 and Sg2). (E) CXCL10 ELISA from conditioned medium (CM) of the indicated Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with ADU at 50 μM for 48 h ( n = 4–8) or PBS control (ctrl). (F) Immunoblot of PTEN-null HCC70 cells treated with ADU at 50 μM for 3 h. (G) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with 50 μM ADU at the indicated time points. (H) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with 50 μM ADU for 24 h. (I) Heatmap showing log2 fold change (L2FC) of a cytokine/chemokine panel, normalized to untreated Scr cells ( n = 2–4). Red asterisk indicates values above assay in all conditions, black asterisk indicates above assay in treated conditions, using the upper limit for L2FC calculation. (J) CXCL10 ELISA in CM from the indicated cell lines with or without 50 μM ADU treatment at 48 h ( n = 2–4). (K) T cell migration assay schematic. (L) Representative images of CD8 + T cells (yellow) migrating toward MDAMB231 spheroids (Hoechst). Migrated CD8 + T cells were quantified after 48 h ( n = 9). Scale bar, 100 μm. (M) Representative images of CD8 + T cells (yellow) migrating toward Rab7 KO MDAMB231 spheroids (Hoechst). Migrated CD8 + T cells were quantified after 48 h ( n = 5–6). Scale bar, 100 μm. Quantitative data are represented as mean ± SEM. p values were calculated by one-way (J, L, and M) and two-way (E) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ns, not significant. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Immune targeting of triple-negative breast cancer through a clinically actionable STING agonist-CAR T cell platform

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102198

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Sustained tumor cell STING signaling promotes T cell migration (A) Representative IHC images of STING staining of a TMA ( n = 63). 0 = no tumor cell staining; 1+ = faint, 2+ = moderate, 3+ = strong staining in >10% of tumor cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Tumor cell STING staining in PTEN-null TNBCs. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Immunoblot of STING and other proteins across TNBC lines, including ADU-S100 (ADU; 50 μM, 3 h)-treated THP-1 monocytes to distinguish phosphorylated STING (pSTING). (D) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 parental cells, cells expressing scramble (Scr), or Rab7 knockout (KO) vectors (Sg1 and Sg2). (E) CXCL10 ELISA from conditioned medium (CM) of the indicated Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with ADU at 50 μM for 48 h ( n = 4–8) or PBS control (ctrl). (F) Immunoblot of PTEN-null HCC70 cells treated with ADU at 50 μM for 3 h. (G) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with 50 μM ADU at the indicated time points. (H) Immunoblot of MDAMB231 Scr or Rab7 KO cells treated with 50 μM ADU for 24 h. (I) Heatmap showing log2 fold change (L2FC) of a cytokine/chemokine panel, normalized to untreated Scr cells ( n = 2–4). Red asterisk indicates values above assay in all conditions, black asterisk indicates above assay in treated conditions, using the upper limit for L2FC calculation. (J) CXCL10 ELISA in CM from the indicated cell lines with or without 50 μM ADU treatment at 48 h ( n = 2–4). (K) T cell migration assay schematic. (L) Representative images of CD8 + T cells (yellow) migrating toward MDAMB231 spheroids (Hoechst). Migrated CD8 + T cells were quantified after 48 h ( n = 9). Scale bar, 100 μm. (M) Representative images of CD8 + T cells (yellow) migrating toward Rab7 KO MDAMB231 spheroids (Hoechst). Migrated CD8 + T cells were quantified after 48 h ( n = 5–6). Scale bar, 100 μm. Quantitative data are represented as mean ± SEM. p values were calculated by one-way (J, L, and M) and two-way (E) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ns, not significant. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: After collagen polymerization, T cells were stained with CellTrace Yellow (Invitrogen, Cat.# C34567 ) and added to one exterior chamber of the device at a 2:1 ratio of tumor spheroids (1:1 ratio for CAR T migration) in complete media with IL-2 (100 IU/mL) for a culture of 48 h. Antibodies blocking CXCL10 (R&D Systems, Cat.# MAB266-SP) and CCL5 (R&D Systems, Cat.# MAB678-SP) or isotype control (R&D Systems, Cat.# MAB002) were also added to the exterior chamber at 1 μg/mL for neutralization.

    Techniques: Migration, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Knock-Out, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control, Cell Migration Assay